Possibility of Full-Time Parents Gay couples can possibly provide a couple of full-time parents, in contrast to many who are being raised by single parents. On one side, there's gay couples saying that marriage bans deny them dignity.
List of Pros of Gay Couple Adoption 1. The complications and tragedies of an imperfect world do not justify the redefinition of marriage. Lesbian mothers did report that their children had greater peer problems; however, these claims proved to me a nonsignificant trend.
Traditionally, it is up to the states to decide rules around weddings, such as the age at which someone can consent to marriage and whether cousins can marry. A child should be allowed to be raised by a same sex couple. The reason being is that the couple who accidentally had the child may not have be properly equipped and prepared to rear a child.
Without this sexual complementarity, and without the ability to consummate a marriage, there can be no marriage.
Additionally, the authors refute the criticisms of Duncan, explaining that a drug using parent who is asked whether she will 'keep the child from drugs' and replies that 'that is her life, it is up to her' is altering the court to her favorable disposition toward drug use for the childFrom a 'best interest of the child' perspective, if homosexual activity- like intravenous drug use- is life shortening morbidity-attracting, less productive, and socially disruptive, children should be placed with parents who will steer them away from it pp.
Homosexual parents and ques tions of character: These arguments are not negated by marriage breakdown, the early death of a parent, the adoption of children, de facto relationships, or the practice of step-parenting. By contrast, two men or two women cannot achieve the same kind of union, since there is no child-oriented outcome or function toward which their bodies can coordinate.
You could easily ask, "Doesn't straight marriage lead to polygamy? Definitions of words change. Supporting marriage as a relationship between parents or potential parents is in the interests of the State. In sexual intercourse, but not in any other form of sexual contact, a man and a woman's bodies coordinate by way of their sexual organs for the common biological purpose of reproduction.
The State lacks a reason to legislate to promote relationships that do not produce children. I believe that same sex adoption is an equally valid method of child raising. Therefore, that "only difference" between you is quite a significant one at least, so says the UDHR.
You're not taking anything away anything from heterosexual couples. By comparing and contrasting these views, I will establish not only the fundamental differences between the perspectives, but also expand on the issues these authors are failing to consider when developing their arguments.
However, we can say with complete certainty that two men will never conceive a child from their sexual acts, nor will two women. Regarding your counterarguments about the definition of marriage, the definition of marriage has not changed.
But observers might consider this projection, as the arguments of faux-marriage activists are thoroughly disingenuous themselves. Children with lesbian parents: A romantic feeling at the time of their wedding was not a requirement for a valid marriage. Two locks make no sense together.Apr 29, · Couples are denied their rights, which has ramifications from child custody to driver licenses to death certificates.
Look at what the status quo means: Gay couples separated in hospitals. Mar 25, · Henry's parents, Sharon Callahan and the comedian Judy Gold, believe they are as capable as any other couple of raising the teen, along with his year-old brother, Ben.
(How) Will Gay Marriage Weaken Marriage as a Social Institution: A Reply to Andrew Koppelman But more substantively, I suggest that the arguments in favor of gay in parent-child couples; single moms with their adult sons, for example. Gay and lesbian individuals and couples are capable of meeting the best interest of the child and should be afforded the same rights and should accept the same responsibilities as heterosexual parents.
Recounting childhood memories of households made deeply dysfunctional by their parents' sexual appetites and the radical subculture that went along with their "gay" identities, all four argued that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples will likely lead to the exploitation and abuse of countless children for political and personal gain.
To oppose gay marriage is to help prevent loving couples from visiting each other in the hospital, from raising a child together, from enjoying the most basic facets of a fulfilling life.Download